<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Shuffle’s DRM : What Were They Thinking ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.net.co.id/2009/03/ipod-shuffle%e2%80%99s-drm-what-were-they-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.net.co.id/2009/03/ipod-shuffle%e2%80%99s-drm-what-were-they-thinking/</link>
	<description>The Web Services Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PT. Nusantara Ekaprana Teknogunakelola (NET) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Sad Excuse : Update on iPod’s earphone DRM chip</title>
		<link>http://www.net.co.id/2009/03/ipod-shuffle%e2%80%99s-drm-what-were-they-thinking/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>PT. Nusantara Ekaprana Teknogunakelola (NET) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Sad Excuse : Update on iPod’s earphone DRM chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.net.co.id/?p=156#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] My last post pointed out the existence of a DRM chip within the earphone of the newest model of Apple’s iPod Shuffle. Shortly afterwards, Cory Doctorow of Boing Boing wrote a short piece of news that in fact, it was an incorrect piece of news. Well, if more accurate findings were made, I’ll be the first to admit that I was wrong too. Let’s check the facts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My last post pointed out the existence of a DRM chip within the earphone of the newest model of Apple’s iPod Shuffle. Shortly afterwards, Cory Doctorow of Boing Boing wrote a short piece of news that in fact, it was an incorrect piece of news. Well, if more accurate findings were made, I’ll be the first to admit that I was wrong too. Let’s check the facts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

